Re: 2.4.19, USB_HID only works compiled in, not as module

[Tyler Longren]

Could this be a problem with my chipset (Via)?  I'm on an Abit VP6
motherboard.  I'm actually suprised I haven't had problems with ide in
2.4.19 (the hpt controller and via).

Below is the usb stuff from lspci -v:
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 16) (prog-if 00
[UHCI])
	Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. (Wrong ID) USB Controller
	Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 12
	I/O ports at d400 [size=32]
	Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2

00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 16) (prog-if 00
[UHCI])
	Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. (Wrong ID) USB Controller
	Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 12
	I/O ports at d800 [size=32]
	Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 07:02:22 +1000

tyler

Brad Hards <[e-mail]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 02:56, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 12:00:55AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> > > Greg: I think this was one of your patches, associated with the
> > > HIDINPUT patch. It looks like the return value is wrong. See
> > > below.
> > >
> > > --- include/linux/hiddev.h.orig Mon Aug  5 23:19:54 2002
> > > +++ include/linux/hiddev.h      Mon Aug  5 23:56:34 2002
> > > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
> > >  int __init hiddev_init(void);
> > >  void __exit hiddev_exit(void);
> > >  #else
> > > -static inline void *hiddev_connect(struct hid_device *hid) {
> > > return NULL; } +static inline void *hiddev_connect(struct
> > > hid_device *hid) { return -1; } static inline void
> > > hiddev_disconnect(struct hid_device *hid){ } static inline void
> > > hiddev_hid_event(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned int usage, int
> > > value) { } static inline int hiddev_init(void) { return 0;}
> >
> > ??? Why return -1 as a void *?
> >
> > The only caller of hiddev_connect is:
> > 	if (!hiddev_connect(hid))
> > 		hid->claimed |= HID_CLAIMED_HIDDEV;
> >
> > Hm, seems like you don't want a void * there at all, but a int,
> > right?
> I assume so.
> 
> > But that doesn't explain the error people are having with the code
> > compiled in.
> No - while doing the investigation, I noted that dmesg was showing
> input0,hiddev0: USB HID v1.10 Keyboard [045e:001d] on usb2:3.0
> input1,hiddev0: USB HID v1.10 Pointer [045e:001d] on usb2:3.1
> input2,hiddev0: USB HID v1.00 Mouse [Logitech USB-PS/2 Mouse M-BA47]
> on usb2:4.0
> 
> with CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV turned off.
> 
> So I chased that down to the above conclusion.
> 
> But I still don't see the problem, and can't duplicate it.
> 
> Brad
> - -- 
> http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in
> Black.-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> 
> iD8DBQE9TufiW6pHgIdAuOMRAojFAKCmSOjjTwcp6z7tPKeR6kaokAF71wCginFW
> 5/94epXIyAJlfpFGtmQqxOY=
> =Ywrd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/