Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q xquad_portio declaration

Martin J. Bligh (Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com)
Tue, 06 Aug 2002 08:06:12 -0700


>> >> This patch is from Matt Dobson. It corrects the definition of
>> >> xquad_portio, getting rid of a compile warning.
>> >
>> > Marcelo - I have a much cleaner change for this.
>>
>> Can you publish it? ;-)
>
> I did - its in -ac4

The STANDALONE thing? I'm not convinced that's really any cleaner,
it makes even more of a mess of io.h than there was already (though
we could consider that a lost cause ;-)).

What's your objection to just throwing in a defn of xquad_portio?
A preference for burying the messy stuff in header files? Seems to
me that as you have to define STANDALONE now, the point is moot.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/