Re: [PATCH] Linux-2.5 fix/improve get_pid()

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
8 Aug 2002 14:30:35 -0700


Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0208081312330.8705-100000@home.transmeta.com>
By author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Guys, this discussion is getting ridiculous.
>
> Doing a bit allocator should be trivial, but it's hard to know when a bit
> is to be free'd. You can't just do it at "exit()" time, because even if
> pid X exits, that doesn't mean that X can be re-used: it may still be used
> as a pgid or a tid by some other process Y.
>
> So if you really want to take this approach, you need to count the uses of
> "pid X", and free the bitmap entry only when that count goes to zero. I
> see no such logic in Bill Irwin's code, only a comment about last use
> (which doesn't explain how to notice that last use).
>

Even so, we need to maintain Not Recently Used semantic. A discussion
on #kernel seems to have ended up with recommending a design target of
"no pid reuse within 30 seconds", with 1 second being an absolute
requirement.

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/