Re: [PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)

Daniel Phillips (phillips@arcor.de)
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 14:34:34 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Phil Auld: "why is lseek broken (>= 2.4.11) ?"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: 2.4.19 Oops :Unable to handle kernel paging request"
In reply to: Chris Mason: "[PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)"

On Monday 05 August 2002 19:34, Chris Mason wrote:
> 2) adds a commit_super() call to struct super_operations(). This allows
> the journaled filesystems to differentiate between calls from sync() and
> calls from kupdated.

Thankyou.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Phil Auld: "why is lseek broken (>= 2.4.11) ?"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: 2.4.19 Oops :Unable to handle kernel paging request"
In reply to: Chris Mason: "[PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)"