> Uz.ytkownik Andre Hedrick napisa?:
> > Clearly the difference between what is silkscreened and the usage intent
> > is beyond the obvious :-/ Since I have had or still have first hand
> > experience in the observed behaior under Linux and MicroSoft, you are
> > going by what is read. Book knowledges gets you books not reality.
> > try a few w/ all of them bootable and see what happens. So until Linux
> > gets a clue about EDDS 2.0 and or 3.0 it has not a chance of getting the
> > correct hd0/hd1 from the INT13/19 services. Obviously experience and
> > first hand knowledge of reality is worthless in Linux. I am out of this
> > thread.
>
> BTW. EDDS is up to level 3.3
That is nice to know since it has never been submitted to the Committee
and the last time I checked with the author it was 3.0. Then again you
are so vast with knowledge, maybe you submitted 3.3 ... LOL.
You are so full of BULLSHIT it is no longer funny.
e02112r1 is the current revision for project proposal for EDDS 3.0.
Gee, where is Martin's name and or Company to be found for the adoption
into ATA-7.
No where.
Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/