Re: pte_chain leak in rmap code (2.5.31)

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:09:41 -0300 (BRT)

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Thomas Molina wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> >
> > > Note the strange use of continue and break which both achieve the same!
> > > What was meant to happen (judging from rmap-13c) is that we break
> > Excellent hunting! Thank you!
> Any chance this is the cause of the following?

Yes, quite possible.

> From: Adam Kropelin <akropel1@rochester.rr.com>
> Date: 2002-08-12 2:54:31

> But we do have a repeatable inconsistency happening with ntpd and
> memory pressure. That may be related, but in that case it's probably
> related to mlock().

kind regards,

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".


http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/