Re: cerberus errors on 2.4.19 (ide dma related)

Ed Sweetman (safemode@speakeasy.net)
18 Aug 2002 14:31:30 -0400


Preempt doesn't seem to be the culprit. Reran the test without using
preempt and I got MEMORY errors within 22 seconds at udma2. So preempt
is not the problem here.

On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 05:19, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> 2.4.19-preempt
>
> All bets are off because who knows what preempt is doing to the state
> machines and in PIO you are dead.
>
> You can not delay transaction of data between interrupts w/o having the
> transport help out. But the preempt don't get it.
>
> If you push your request size down to 8k or to a page you preempt problems
> will go away, only because granularity of requests. And the price is
> performance goes in the tank. But this is preempt so who cares.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/