Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q disable irqbalance

James Cleverdon (jamesclv@us.ibm.com)
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 18:23:55 -0700

On Saturday 24 August 2002 05:19 am, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Well, it makes performance _so_ much better on a P4 that it's not even
> > funny. It's basically a "P4 is unusable with SMP" without it.
>
> Out of interest, does anyone have an idea of what Windows does?
>
> Zwane

I'm not allowed to report second hand rumors from the folks who assisted with
the debug of the x440 HAL, so I won't mention that they may or may not be
using clustered logical interrupts and adjusting priority with the TPR.

I can admit that I have no clue how they assign IRQs to APIC clusters, whether
randomly or if they try some load balancing scheme.

-- 
James Cleverdon
IBM xSeries Linux Solutions
{jamesclv(Unix, preferred), cleverdj(Notes)} at us dot ibm dot com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/