Re: [PATCH] sched.c

Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:47:12 +1000

On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:35:49 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:
> But these are not performance-critical functions. And by far the
> most inefficient part of them is that they're reading data for
> CPUs which cannot exist. That can be fixed with a `cpu_possible(i)'
> test in there, but Rusty was going to give us a `for_each_cpu' macro.
> We haven't seen that yet.

I have it, but Linus isn't taking the prerequeisite, which changes cpu masks
to generic bitmaps.

Due to be retransmitted in the next couple of days,
Rusty.

-- 
   there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
   many doers quoting their contemporaries.  -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/