On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > - bool 'Multiquad NUMA system' CONFIG_MULTIQUAD
> > + bool 'Multi-node NUMA system support' CONFIG_X86_NUMA
>
> Why not simply CONFIG_NUMA?
Because NUMA is subordinate to X86, and another technology named NUMA
might appear? Nano-uplinked micro-array... No Ugliness Munched Archive?
Whatever...
Thunder
-- --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .- --/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..- .- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.- --./.-/-.../.-./.././.-../.-.-.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/