Re: [patch] adjustments to dirty memory thresholds

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 21:26:24 -0300 (BRT)


On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:

> But sigh. Pointlessly scanning zillions of dirty pages and doing
> nothing with them is dumb. So much better to go for a FIFO snooze on a
> per-zone waitqueue, be woken when some memory has been cleansed.

But not per-zone, since many (most?) allocations can be satisfied
from multiple zones. Guess what 2.4-rmap has had for ages ?

Interested in a port for 2.5 on top of 2.5.32-mm2 ? ;)

[I'll mercilessly increase your patch queue since it doesn't show
any sign of ever shrinking anyway]

cheers,

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/