Still, it's a good idea to have a UP version, and fix that naked
reference to "cpu" in cpu_online() which just makes me damn nervous.
Rusty.
-- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.Name: cpu_possible for UP Author: Rusty Russell Status: Trivial
D: This patch defines cpu_possible() for non-SMP.
diff -urpN --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.32/include/linux/smp.h working-2.5.32-cpu-possible/include/linux/smp.h --- linux-2.5.32/include/linux/smp.h 2002-08-28 09:29:53.000000000 +1000 +++ working-2.5.32-cpu-possible/include/linux/smp.h 2002-08-29 15:30:49.000000000 +1000 @@ -94,9 +94,10 @@ int cpu_up(unsigned int cpu); static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { } static inline void smp_send_reschedule_all(void) { } #define cpu_online_map 1 -#define cpu_online(cpu) ({ cpu; 1; }) +#define cpu_online(cpu) ({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; }) #define num_online_cpus() 1 #define num_booting_cpus() 1 +#define cpu_possible(i) ({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; }) struct notifier_block; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/