2.4.20-pre5 more stable than 2.4.19??? (was e1000/2.4)

Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (roy@karlsbakk.net)
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 13:14:11 +0200

hi all

David S. Miller tells me here that '2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than
2.4.19 anyways'

is this correct?

---------- Forwarded Message ----------

Subject: e1000/2.4
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: roy@karlsbakk.net

If you get "a patch" it almost certainly won't build because the e1000
driver in 2.4.20-preX depends upon the NAPI stuff we added to the
2.4.x tree

2.4.20-pre5 is tons more stable than 2.4.19 anyways :-)

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/
Tel: +47 9801 3356


Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/