Re: Killing/balancing processes when overcommited

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:03:34 -0300 (BRT)


On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > 1) memory is exhausted
> > 2) the network driver can't allocate memory and
> > spits out a message
> > 3) syslogd and/or klogd get killed
> >
> > Clearly you want to be a bit smarter about which process to kill.
>
> Ill-implemented klogd/syslogd. Pre-allocating a little memory
> is one way to go, or drop messages until allocation
> becomes possible again. Then log a complaint about
> messages missing due to a temporary OOM.

No. This has absolutely nothing to do with it.

In this case, "allocating memory" simply means that klogd/syslogd
page faults on something it already allocated, say a piece of the
executable or a swapped-out buffer.

Simple page faults like this can also trigger an OOM-killing.

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/