RE:Understanding the Principles of Argumentation #3

Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 20:11:52 +0100


--1032203512559
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Rusty doesn't like people quoting him in signatures, but that ones a definate possibility...

Cheers, Dean McEwan. Currently hacking KGI, which I don't understand, oh and ask me about OpenModemTalk...

On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:36:42 +0200 Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de> wrote:

--1032203512559
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.116.70.75]) by smtp.cwctv.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.447.44);
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 17:40:26 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
id <S262544AbSIPQcU>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:32:20 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
id <S262608AbSIPQcU>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:32:20 -0400
Received: from dsl-213-023-040-192.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.40.192]:65415 "EHLO
starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262544AbSIPQcT>;
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:32:19 -0400
Received: from daniel by starship with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 17qyrb-0000Jv-00; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:36:43 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Understanding the Principles of Argumentation #3
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:36:42 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
Cc: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20020916120022.22FFC2C12A@lists.samba.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020916120022.22FFC2C12A@lists.samba.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <E17qyrb-0000Jv-00@starship>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: linux-kernel-owner+Hell.Surfers=40cwctv.net@vger.kernel.org

This is the third in my "Understanding the Principles of Argumentation"
series. Rusty has obligingly provided us with a fine example of an "ad
hominem attack":

On Monday 16 September 2002 04:17, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Don't forget that the Unix way has traditionally been to use the
> > simplest interface that will do the job; if you propose a fat
> > interface you need to prove that the thin one cannot do the job.
>
> Gee, really? You're so clever!
>
> You patronising little shit,

An ad hominem attack is a logical fallacy where the arguer attacks the
person, rather than the issue:

http://home.mcn.net/~montanabw/fallacies.html

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--1032203512559--

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/