Re: is any virtual address space reserved?

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 19:11:15 -0300 (BRT)


On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Russ Lewis wrote:

> Is any of a userland application's virtual address space reserved?
> Certainly, some memory is used at startup: the code is loaded into some
> of the virtual space, as well as the stack. There needs to always be
> enough space for the stack to grow as necessary. But is any of the
> space actually marked off as "reserved"? If we just mmap'ed the same
> file over and over again, could we fill the 4Gb address space with
> identical mappings, or would we run out?

There are a number of issues here:

1) userspace has 3 GB space, kernel has the other 1 GB

2) if you want to mmap a file over and over again, you'll
need to have the code that maps the file and the glibc
mmap(3) stuff mapped into your address space ;)

3) your process will want to have a stack somewhere

4) address 0 is reserved to trap NULL pointer dereferences
both in kernel and user space

cheers,

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/