Re: [PATCH] break out task_struct from sched.h

Tim Schmielau (tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de)
Tue, 1 Oct 2002 00:57:20 +0200 (CEST)


On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> I tried something similar before: I seperated out mm_struct from sched.h
> so that mm.h does not have to include sched.h any more. At that time,
> the results were poor, because most of the files that include mm.h but
> not sched.h actually need 'current' or something else from sched.h
> and I then had to include sched.h by hand in them.
>
> With your work, it probably makes sense to look into this again.

That'd be great.

> Note that 241 of your 614 files that don't need sched.h still include
> it through either linux/mm.h or linux/interrupt.h, so don't gain anything
> there.

Yep, and last time I checked also compile time improvements were poor
(if measurable at all) because of this.
But with further cleanups like what you suggested we'll (slowly, but
steadily) proceed.
I also intend to redo the analysis after further header file detangling,
but let's get this applied first.

Tim

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/