Re: A simple request (was Re: boring BK stats)

[Rogier Wolff]

On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:35:38PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 07:28:18AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > The laptop has 200MB RAM, and mozilla and a ton of xterms loaded.  IDE 
> > > drives w/ Intel PIIX4 controller.  The Dual Athlon has 512MB RAM, and I 
> > > forget what kind of IDE controller -- I think AMD.  IDE drives as well.
> > > 
> > > BitKeeper must scan the entire tree when doing a checkin or checkout, so 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > In low memory situations you really want to run the tree compressed.  
> > ON a fast machine do a "bk -r admin -Z" and then clone that onto your
> > laptop.  I think that will drop the tree to about 145MB which will
> > help, maybe.  I suspect that you use enough of the rest of your 200MB
> > that it still won't fit.
> 
> [...]
> > There is only so much we can do when you are trying to cram 10 pounds of
> > crap in a 5 pound bag :(
> 
> The reason that one or two years ago my "diff+multiple trees" beat
> bitkeeper on the performance front was that diff would only touch
> inode-metadata, and not the files themselves. You can cache the
> file-metadata (inodes) of a 200M tree in a couple of megabytes of RAM.

Jeff: 

The trick is that I would have hardlinked trees. Thus 

	linux-2.2.18.clean/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c
and
	linux-2.2.18.rio/drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c

would have the same inode number, and diff wouldn't even bother to
open the file.... 

				Roger. 

-- 
** [e-mail] ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** [phone] **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* The Worlds Ecosystem is a stable system. Stable systems may experience *
* excursions from the stable situation. We are currenly in such an       * 
* excursion: The stable situation does not include humans. ***************