On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:49 am, John Stoffel wrote:
> Con,
>
> Why are you bothering to show the older 2.5.3x series of kernels, but
> dropping the 2.4.18 results? Wouldn't it make sense to see how the
> latest kernels in each section were doing?
My main interest in doing these is to help 2.5 development as 2.4 is not
changing dramatically anywhere in the near future. As the number of data
points increase the ability to sift through the information will decrease.
The comparison to 2.4 kernels has been made in the past and I felt that
showing the progression of 2.5 would be more helpful as the change made by
each step could be quantified. I dont mind posting a full set of benchmarks
but people are less likely to read through a huge set of data trying to find
the relevant information. If someone feels I am in error I would be happy to
change what I'm doing.
Cheers,
Con.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9rX4NF6dfvkL3i1gRAq8oAJ9QwnsPvNx4P7MDZdDWJOonA/HDUgCfTKj3
hReHZbmbXsCjCkuEJwOrDpQ=
=lun1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/