Re: [lkcd-devel] Re: What's left over.

Werner Almesberger (wa@almesberger.net)
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:39:35 -0300


Richard J Moore wrote:
> and so do many people. In fact netdump, mcode and lkcd are all
> complementary parts of the same need.

It's the "complementary" that worries me. Once you have mcore, what
good are direct dumps to the network or the disk for ? With mcore,
the whole issue of accessing stable storage is eliminated.

I don't know if the approach of having multiple quasi-equivalent
means of storing a dump is something that Linus dislikes about
LKCD, but I think it might be worth exploring if LKCD's chance of
acceptance could be improved by focusing on a single but general
mechanism.

I think it would be a pity if we ended up not having crash dumps
in 2.6 only because they're over-featured ...

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina         wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/