Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)

Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Sat, 2 Nov 2002 21:07:24 +0000

On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 08:36:08PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of the
> qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to like
> the library?

Maybe, maybe not. Most, if not all of my boxes here don't have qt, and
they're not going to get qt any time soon. qt has a long list of
dependencies which gtk doesn't have, which, imho is an overriding factor
for why we should have a gtk implementation.

Not that I used the old xconfig often anyway. 8)

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/