> we broke binary compatibility several times, for the benefit of having a
> cleaner interface. Ulrich has no problems with this approach and NPTL is
> the only user of these interfaces currently. But i think you are one of
> the few peoples who are running an NPTL system (ie. with the new
> NPTL-glibc actually installed as the default system glibc) - is binary
> compatibility important to you for this specific case?
No, but since I don't see any advantage in breaking it (other than a
more aesthetically pleasing header), why break it?
The problem is just the numbering of the flags, not the new
functionality.
--=-FJOfvXEdLOrHMod3mN4X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA91/kGdjkty3ft5+cRAgSUAKDDXjn9zfIAQn0GadrbHYfBogfuCACgkvb2
BIdtmLVlnKWagI/ypiIR2y0=
=93Sj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-FJOfvXEdLOrHMod3mN4X--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/