Re: NUMA scheduler BK tree

[Martin J. Bligh]

> in order to make it easier to keep up with the main Linux tree I've
> set up a bitkeeper repository with our NUMA scheduler at
>        bk://numa-ef.bkbits.net/numa-sched
> (Web view:  http://numa-ef.bkbits.net/)
> This used to contain my node affine NUMA scheduler, I'll add extra
> trees when the additional patches for that are tested on top of our
> NUMA scheduler.
> 
> Is it ok for you to have it this way or would you prefer having the
> core and the initial load balancer separate?
> 
> The tree is currently in sync with bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 and
> I'll try to keep so.

BTW, can you keep producing normal patches too, when you do an update? 
I don't use bitkeeper ...

Thanks,

Martin.