Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
20 Nov 2002 20:49:33 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: erich@uruk.org: "Re: PATCH: Recognize Tualatin cache size in 2.4.x"
Previous message: Luca Barbieri: "Re: [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.48-A1"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"

On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 19:55, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> So " -fno-inline " should be enough to squelch the extremists?

Its not relevant to the discussion even.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: erich@uruk.org: "Re: PATCH: Recognize Tualatin cache size in 2.4.x"
Previous message: Luca Barbieri: "Re: [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.48-A1"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules"