Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions

James Morris (jmorris@intercode.com.au)
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 19:04:56 +1100 (EST)


On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Greg KH wrote:

> Anyway, there's no way to resolve both this percieved problem, and the
> "smaller and easier" patch that I proposed, right? Unless we want to
> export all dummy operation functions for all modules to use? I could do
> that, but it's pretty messy...

Yeah, very. I guess a security module could check the kernel version and
print a warning to the effect "this module has not been verified with this
kernel version" either at compile or runtime, if needed.

- James

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@intercode.com.au>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/