Re: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9

[Giacomo Catenazzi]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> 
>>
>> kprintf would be better
> 
>  >
> 
> Why?  We don't have, say, kstrcpy() or ksscanf() for other functions 
> that are library-equivalent.

k to remember people that it is not the std function, thus not a write to
the standard output. I see more like fprintf (file) and [v]sprintf (string),
we write to a special buffer ("klog").
But if we don't move the verbosity level out of string, also the simple
'printf' would be fine.

ciao
	giacomo