Re: [patch] kmalloc_percpu -- 2 of 2

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:32:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Where in the kernel is such a large number of 4-, 8- or 16-byte
> objects being used?
> The slab allocator will support caches right down to 1024 x 4-byte
> objects per page.  Why is that not appropriate?
> If it is for locality-of-reference between individual objects then
> where in the kernel is this required, and are performance measurements
> available?  It is very unusual to have objects which are so small,
> and a better design would be to obtain the locality of reference
> by aggregating the data into an array or structure.

I will argue not on the frequency of calls but on the preciousness of
space; highmem feels very serious pain when internal fragmentation
of pinned pages occurs (which this is designed to prevent). I don't
have direct experience with this patch/API, but I can say that
fragmentation in ZONE_NORMAL is deadly (witness pagetable occupancy
vs. ZONE_NORMAL consumption, which motivated highpte, despite my
pagetable reclamation smoke blowing).

Bill