Re: BUG in 2.5.50

venom@sns.it
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:55:14 +0100 (CET)


On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, John Bradford wrote:

> > please try without it.
>
> Is IDE TCQ liable to corrupt data on read-only volumes or just
> read-write? The problem with nobody using it, is that it never gets
> tested - if there are no known issues with read-only use it would be
> nice to know.

Well, to say the truth, when I tested it with 2.4.49, my IBM disk was running
mutch slower than without TCQ, so I rebuilt a kernel without it just after one
hour of tests.
I think it will be difficoult that people will use it longer that 5 minutes if
they don't see some performance gain (except people using it because they
have some serious interess to develop IDE TCQ code).
On the other side, also if there are stability problems, a lot of people will
test it if they think they can gain a better performance.

bests

Luigi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/