Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again)

[Keith Owens]

On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:56:30 +0100, 
"Martin Schwidefsky" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Well, that is tricky independently of the actual argument stuff - even
>the
>> _current_ system call restart ends up being tricky for you in that case,
>I
>> suspect. The current one already basically depends on rewriting the
>system
>> call number, it just leaves the arguments untouched.
>
>The current system call restart doesn't change the system call number. We just
>substract two from the psw address (aka eip) and go back to user space.

  EX R1,syscall - instruction length is 4, not 2.