Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:32:31 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Kristis Makris: "[PATCH] signal.c: wrong rt signals comment, 2.4.20-pre11"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: R: Kernel bug handling TCP_RTO_MAX?"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "[PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent"
Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent"
Reply: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent"

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:34:39 +1100

Another in the COMPAT series. This build on the previous patches.

I'm totally fine with this stuff (and the sparc64 specific part), but
watch out, this patch removes the kernel/compat.c utimes stuff :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kristis Makris: "[PATCH] signal.c: wrong rt signals comment, 2.4.20-pre11"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: R: Kernel bug handling TCP_RTO_MAX?"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "[PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent"
Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent"
Reply: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] consolidate sys32_new[lf]stat - architecture independent"