Re: [PATCH]Timer list init is done AFTER use

[Andrew Morton]

george anzinger wrote:
> 
> ...
> > The logical thing is to implement arch_consoles_callable().  Does
> > this look workable?
> 
> I am not sure.  The first question is when does the online
> bit get set for cpu 0.

Too late, probably.  We might need an escape clause for the boot
CPU there.

>  The next is that it does inhibit a
> rather large block of printks.  Is this ok?

They get buffered, so the info will come out eventually.  But we do want
it to come out in a timely manner.
 
> Mind you, I have not tried it yet...

I think it's the right approach.  I can take poke at it if you like.