Re: 2.5.53-mm3: bad: scheduling while atomic!

Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Sun, 29 Dec 2002 21:41:02 -0800


khromy wrote:
>
> Running 2.5.53-mm3, I got the following:
>
> bad: scheduling while atomic!
> Call Trace:
> [<c0114381>] do_schedule+0x3d/0x2c8
> [<c011d9b0>] schedule_timeout+0x80/0xa0
> [<c011d924>] process_timeout+0x0/0xc
> [<c0115315>] io_schedule_timeout+0x11/0x1c
> [<c01de5de>] blk_congestion_wait+0x8a/0xa0
> [<c0115a54>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
> [<c0115a54>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x38
> [<c012fbb4>] try_to_free_pages+0x3c/0xbc
> [<c012a33c>] __alloc_pages+0x1b4/0x260
> [<c012a410>] __get_free_pages+0x28/0x64
> [<c012c7e6>] cache_grow+0xb6/0x20c
> [<c012c9cf>] __cache_alloc_refill+0x93/0x220
> [<c012cb96>] cache_alloc_refill+0x3a/0x58
> [<c012cf1d>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x45/0xc8
> [<c0136460>] pte_chain_alloc+0x38/0x68

OK, thanks. That's a harmless bug in the new pte_chain_alloc().

Turns out that sleep-in-spinlock debugging is currently broken
for slab allocations - it is only enabled when slab debugging is
enabled. grr.

I'll fix those things up in the next round.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/