RE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

--1041488191426
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

in a way, yes.

Dean McEwan, If the drugs don't work, [sarcasm] take more...[/sarcasm].

On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 17:08:26 -0800 (PST) David Lang <[e-mail]> wrote:

--1041488191426
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from warden.diginsite.com ([208.29.163.248]) by smtp.cwctv.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.447.44);
	 Thu, 2 Jan 2003 01:21:00 +0000
Received: from wlvims01.diginsite.com by warden.diginsite.com
          via smtpd (for smtp.cwctv.net [213.104.18.14]) with SMTP; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 17:18:42 -0800
Received: from wlvexc02.digitalinsight.com ([10.201.10.15])
          by wlvims01.digitalinsight.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3
          release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with ESMTP id com;
          Wed, 1 Jan 2003 17:19:08 -0800
Received: by wlvexc02.diginsite.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <Z58HYAKZ>; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 17:17:00 -0800
Received: from dlang.diginsite.com ([10.201.10.67]) by wlvexc00.digitalinsight.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
	id Z9L0CVAR; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 17:16:51 -0800
From: David Lang <[e-mail]>
To: Paul Jakma <[e-mail]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], 
	[e-mail], [e-mail]
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 17:08:26 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Return-Path: [e-mail]

well libc uses the kernel headers and basicly all userspace programs use
libc so that makes oracle a derivitive work of the kernel??????

luckly that's not how things actually work.

David Lang

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Paul Jakma wrote:

> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 00:31:13 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Paul Jakma <[e-mail]>
> To: Rik van Riel <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source
>     drivers?
>
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > Copyright law is pretty explicit about the situations the GPL
> > applies to.  If something can be reasonably considered to be a
> > "derivative work" of a GPL work, the GPL applies and the new work
> > needs to be GPL.
>
> and:
>
> > but only a song.  If nvidia's driver only uses some simple
> > declarations from include files and no large (>7 lines? >10lines?
> > what's large?) inline functions AND the nvidia driver uses only the
> > standard interfaces to hook into the Linux kernel, then it's not a
> > derivative work and nvidia gets to choose the license.
>
> It has long been held that linking to GPL code is suffient to
> consitute 'derived work' status, hence the existence of the LGPL.
>
> The NVidia shim makes use of several kernel subsystems, the PCI
> device layer, the VM, the module system (well really, the kernel
> makes of use of the functions the module provides :) ), IRQ
> subsystem, the VFS, etc.. These systems are rather large bodies of
> code - without which the NVidia kernel driver could not work.
>
> So I am not quite sure on what basis one could argue the NVidia
> driver is not a derivative work, and hence it seems to me the NVidia
> driver is technically in material breach of GPL.
>
> You seem to be basing your opinion on:
>
>  "the nvidia driver uses only the standard interfaces to hook into
>  the Linux kernel"
>
> How are the standard interfaces not covered by the GPL?
>
> I know Linus' has often posted to l-k that he doesnt care about
> binary only modules as long as they stick to the exported interfaces.
> However, are all the kernel developers agreed on this? And if so, can
> this exception be formalised and put into the COPYING file? If not,
> then is NVidia not in breach of the kernel's licence?
>
> > Rik
>
> regards,
> --
> Paul Jakma	[e-mail]	[e-mail]	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
> 	warning: do not ever send email to [e-mail]
> Fortune:
> Programmers do it bit by bit.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--1041488191426--