Re: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww......

Andrew S. Johnson (andy@asjohnson.com)
Thu, 02 Jan 2003 01:26:40 -0600


Paul Rolland wrote:
> Well, I did made another kernel without ACPI and with APM,
> and it is working fine.

Did you try using acpi=no-idle in your kernel append line (if using
lilo) and see what difference that makes? It works in 2.4.

Andy Johnson

>
> To summarize :
> - ACPI Enumeration only is fine
> - More functionnalities from ACPI is bad.
>
> If someone has an idea and wants me to make tests, please contact
> me...
>
> Regards,
> Paul

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/