Re: UDMA 133 on a 40 pin cable

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
03 Jan 2003 01:57:56 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] TCP Zero Copy for mmapped files"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] TCP Zero Copy for mmapped files"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: UDMA 133 on a 40 pin cable"
Next in thread: John Bradford: "IDE termination (was Re: UDMA 133 on a 40 pin cable)"
Reply: John Bradford: "IDE termination (was Re: UDMA 133 on a 40 pin cable)"

On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 01:04, Lionel Bouton wrote:
> I don't think ATA66+ controllers can be within spec if they don't detect
> 40 vs 80 pin cables.

I wish. Alas not in the real world.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] TCP Zero Copy for mmapped files"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] TCP Zero Copy for mmapped files"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: UDMA 133 on a 40 pin cable"
Next in thread: John Bradford: "IDE termination (was Re: UDMA 133 on a 40 pin cable)"
Reply: John Bradford: "IDE termination (was Re: UDMA 133 on a 40 pin cable)"