Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 3/8 sparc64

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Fri, 03 Jan 2003 18:56:28 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Shane R. Stixrud: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
Previous message: Mikael Pettersson: "[PATCH] 2.5.54 fix ide-cd/ide-scsi oopses after module unload"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "[PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 3/8 sparc64"
Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 3/8 sparc64"
Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "[PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 4/8 x86_64"

Stephen, where are compat_off_t and compat_pid_t defined
on sparc64? I think your patch depends upon some other set
of changes you've done which haven't been applied yet.

Therefore I've just changes your patch to get the build to pass
properly on sparc64.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Shane R. Stixrud: "Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?"
Previous message: Mikael Pettersson: "[PATCH] 2.5.54 fix ide-cd/ide-scsi oopses after module unload"
In reply to: Stephen Rothwell: "[PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 3/8 sparc64"
Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 3/8 sparc64"
Next in thread: Stephen Rothwell: "[PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 4/8 x86_64"