Re: [RFC] irq handling code consolidation, second try (v850 part)
Andrey Panin (pazke@orbita1.ru)
Sat, 4 Jan 2003 16:03:52 +0300
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 10:00:29PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Can't test it, but the v850 part looks great, ah, it's lovely to see all
> that code being deleted...
>
> One comment: `arch_check_irq' is a bad name, it doesn't make it at all
> clear what it does.
>
> I might suggest inverting the sense, and using `irq_valid' -- the `arch_'
> prefix seems unnecessary (as with `irq_desc') since it's not a
> arch-specific version of a more general wrapper.
I used arch_ prefix to clearly mark arch specifig things, but
irq_valid() is probably a better name. Comments ?
--
Andrey Panin | Embedded systems software developer
pazke@orbita1.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/