Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Tue, 07 Jan 2003 10:15:20 -0500


--==_Exmh_-1303455072P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 10:08:00 +0100, Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no> said:
> loss. Giving away driver code (or at least programming specs)
> wouldn't be a loss to nvidia though - because users would still
> need to buy those cards.

It would be a major loss to nvidia *AND* its customers if it were bankrupted in
a lawsuit because it open-sourced code or specs that contained intellectual
property that belonged to somebody else. Of course, if that happened, you'd
still have the "freedom" to buy the other vendor's cards - maybe(*)

In the real world, ideology needs to be tempered with realism.

(*) there's a ripple effect here - if the otherwise-best laptop is only
available with an nvidia card, you now have the "freedom" to choose a otherwise
less-suitable model. And so on....

--==_Exmh_-1303455072P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQE+Gu8IcC3lWbTT17ARAsIHAJ9y0q1hlZSwBeQDFm76/1aEGAeSJQCgkr42
uj/uHmYxFH51KGB6ApEVOPU=
=ygei
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1303455072P--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/