On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:33:46 EST, Jeff Garzik said:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:26:47PM -0800, jjs wrote:
> > But according to my understanding, a more accurate
> > measure of nptl performance would require a current
> > glibc, with the nptl-specific enhancements -
> >
> > or am I missing something here?
>
> You are correct: you need a recent 2.5 kernel and a recent glibc.
I'll bite - how recent a glibc? Does the 2.3.1 RPM that RedHat included
on the Phoebe beta qualify, or do we need even more bleeding-edge?
--==_Exmh_-1139781780P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE+H3Y0cC3lWbTT17ARAscmAJ9ZfSM6QxnLcUaew0yF9KEDj2EjlgCgjd9E
GJgBgU8l8vaNPfHyrVLD570=
=9yPu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1139781780P--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/