Andrew Morton wrote:
 >It's probably better to use submit_bh().  Set the BH_Lock and BH_Mapped bits,
 >also set up b_end_io.  Then do a wait_on_buffer(), wait for the IO to
 >complete.  There's some similar code in
 >fs/jbd/journal.c:journal_write_metadata_buffer().
Thanks, that's exactly the sort of thing I was looking for.
 >However, what you're doing is an odd thing.  If there is already pagecache
 >against that block device then the kernel doesn't know that you've changed
 >the bytes on-disk and will cheerfully proceed to use (and write out) the
 >cached data.  You'll lose your modifications..
 >
 >It would be better to use sb_getblk() or bread(), to lock the returned
 >buffer_head, then copy your data into it and to then write it back with
 >submit_bh() or ll_rw_block().  Or just leave it dirty and let the kernel
 >write it out in due course.
Fair enough, that seems like the right thing to do so I'll look into it.
Thanks,
Brian
-- bkelly@sulaco.com- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/