Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:10:13 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andreas Hartmann: "Antwort: Re: [i2c-piix4.o: IBM Laptop detected; this module may corrupt"
Previous message: Aniruddha M Marathe: "[BENCHMARK] TIObench performance of 2.5.59"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"

I'm totally fine with this work, in fact I consider it
a cleanup.

I could call it a bug fix, but that would be stretching it :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andreas Hartmann: "Antwort: Re: [i2c-piix4.o: IBM Laptop detected; this module may corrupt"
Previous message: Aniruddha M Marathe: "[BENCHMARK] TIObench performance of 2.5.59"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"
Reply: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t"