Re: swsuspend: possible with VIA Eden processor? Or alternatives?

[Wolfgang Fritz]

Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 06:14:04PM +0100, Wolfgang Fritz wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  > 
>  > the swsuspend mini howto says that a processor with pse/pse36 feature is 
>  > required for swsupend in 2.4.
>  > 
>  > So I am obviously out of luck with 2.4 kernels, but what about 2.5 (the 
>  > mini-howto is silent here)?
> 
>>From include/asm-i386/suspend.h
> 
> static inline void
> arch_prepare_suspend(void)
> {
>     if (!cpu_has_pse)
>         panic("pse required");
> }
> 
I assume this is from a 2.5 kernel (I have no source tree available 
here). I'll check that tomorrow in the office.

> There's really no requirement that you *need* PSE to be able to
> do suspend, but it seems no-one has stepped forward to write the
> necessary code to support non-PSE afaics.
>
I don't even know what pse means :-(

Thank you

Wolfgang

> 		Dave
>