Re: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance

[Andi Kleen]

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 03:05:06PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> The results below leaves me distinctly unconvinced by the supposed 
> merits of modern gcc's. Not really better or worse, within experimental
> error. But much slower to compile things with.

Curious - could you compare it with a gcc 3.3 snapshot too?

It should be even slower at compiling, but generate better code.

-Andi