The code is correct as it originally stood.
It looks like indent has a bug and incorrectly formats this to look wrong.
Back in 2.2 times, the code looks  like this:
		for (new2size = 128; new2size < newsize; new2size <<= 1);
		if (new2size - newsize > newsize - (new2size >> 1))
			new2size >>= 1;
and this is the intended functionality.  Please do NOT apply the patch.
-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/