Re: [Lse-tech] gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance

Falk Hueffner (falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de)
10 Feb 2003 21:49:19 +0100


Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net> writes:

> BTW, in case any gcc hacker is paying attention, the documentation
> fails to mention the gcc version required for this or any other
> attribute. Also it would be nice to have an option to ditch the
> (char*) exception; it's junk when you have __may_alias__.

I don't think a switch that makes standard compliant source break in
potentially very subtle ways is a good idea. Just use "restrict".

-- 
	Falk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/