Re: Synchronous signal delivery..

[Abramo Bagnara]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > It does not have necessarily to be just another ioctl/fcntl, it can be a
> > write. About security, chages might be allowed only to the task that
> > created the fd, if you're concerned. It's not that someone will starve
> > w/out such functionality though.
> 
> I'd actually like to reserve writes to _sending_ signals. Especially if
> you have another process that listens in on the signals you get, it might
> want to also force the signals through.

This reminds me the unfortunate (and much needed) lack of an unified way
to send/receive out-of-band data to/from a regular fd.

Something like:
	oob = fd_open(fd, channel, flags);
	write(oob, ...)
	read(oob, ....)
	close(oob);

Don't you think it's time to introduce it and to start to avoid the
proliferation of different tricky ways to do the same things?

-- 
Abramo Bagnara                       mailto:[e-mail]

Opera Unica                          Phone: [phone]
Via Emilia Interna, 140
48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy