Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2

[Ed Tomlinson]

Jens Axboe wrote:
 
> The version posted the other day did fair queueing of requests between
> processes, but it did not help to provide fair request allocation. This
> version does that too, results are rather remarkable. In addition, the
> following changes were made:

The numbers from the second message are nice - especially considering this
is only the second iteration...

A question about io priorities.  I wonder if they could not be implemented
via a per pid cfq_quantum?  If I am not missunderstanding things, a bigger
value here for a given process should mean that it gets a larger share of 
the io bandwidth...

Comments?
Ed Tomlinson