Re: [PATCH] cciss: add passthrough ioctl

Arjan van de Ven (
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:27:06 +0000

On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:26:40AM +0600, Stephen Cameron wrote:
> Because, in order to flash the array controller firmware,
> it's got to be done that way...

I don't buy this. Sorry. What's against creating a device for this
controller itself ?
(And yes, the kernel could use a formal ioctl number for "upgrade firmware")
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at