Re: Linux vs Windows temperature anomaly

Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 23:50:57 +0000

On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:38:44AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:11 am, Herman Oosthuysen wrote:
> > Linux is more 'busy' than windoze and I have heard of boxes frying when
> > running Linux. The solution is to find a better motherboard
> > manufacturer...
>
> That doesn't make sense. His post said the temperature was 20 degrees lower
> when it failed.

It makes perfect sense. Components drawing power produce heat, which
causes a temperature rise above ambient. Put simply, if a chip that
fails at a case temperature of 50C and you have a 10C rise, it'll fail
at 40C. If you have a 20C rise, it'll fail at 30C.

PS, the efficiency of heatsinks is measured in degC/W - how many degrees
celcius the temperature rises for each watt of power dissipated. Double
the dissipated power, double the temperature rise.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/