Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3

Ingo Molnar (
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:27:15 +0100 (CET)

On 6 Mar 2003, Robert Love wrote:

> > in addition, timeslices should be shortest for high priority processes
> > (depending on dynamic prio, not static)
> No, they should be longer. In some cases they should be nearly
> infinitely long (which is sort of what we do with the reinsertion into
> the active array for highly interactive tasks). [...]

yes, and in fact tasks with 'infinite timeslice' do exist: RT tasks with


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at